Thoracic Research and Practice
Original Article

Etiology and Epidemiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Turkey

1.

Şifa Üniversitesi Bornova Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göğüs Hastalıkları Kliniği, İzmir, Türkiye

2.

Özel Yüzüncü Yıl Hastanesi, Göğüs Hastalıkları Kliniği, İzmir, Türkiye

3.

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Mikrobiyoloji ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye

4.

Dr. Suat Seren Göğüs Hastalıkları Hastanesi, Mikrobiyoloji ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Kliniği, İzmir, Türkiye

5.

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye

Thorac Res Pract 2013; 14: 5-10
DOI: 10.5152/ttd.2013.02
Read: 2058 Downloads: 1255 Published: 18 July 2019

Abstract

Objectives: Due to its prevalence and mortality, Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant health issue. Epidemiological data is crucial in deciding empirical treatment. Since sufficient knowledge of CAP epidemiology is not available in Turkey, this study has been planned.

 

Material and Methods: Seventy-two cases were assessed prospectively. The following tests were used for agent identification: (phlegm) Gram’s Stain and culture for bacteria, (serum) indirect immunofluorescent test for M. pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae, Enzyme Immuno Assay test for respiratory tract viruses, (urine) Antigen Enzyme Immune Assay test for Legionella pneumophila serogroup I antigen.

 

Results: The rate at which the etiologic agent was reached was found to be 77.8%. While the viruses were the most frequent infection agent (57.1%), the rate of the presence of mixed infection of other agents with viruses was 48.2%. Agents that were observed to be a single pathogen were; Influenzae A virus (6.9%), C. pneumoniae (28.6%), M. pneumoniae (25.0%), S. pneumoniae (10.7%), H. influenzae ve M. catarrhalis (7.1%), with respect to their prevalence. Mortality rate was 10.4%.

 

Conclusion: In addition to the high viral etiology rate, the prevalence of mixed infection is of concern. While, as the responsible agent, S. pneumoniae was lower than expected, the fact that C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae had higher rates suggest s the necessity of bearing in mind the atypical pneumonia agents during the treatment. The data obtained were in conformity with the results of the literature in general.

Files
EISSN 2979-9139