Thoracic Research and Practice
Clinical Study

A Comparative Study of Two Small-Bore Pleural Drainage Systems

1.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

2.

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara

3.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Thorac Res Pract 2003; 4: Turkish Respiratory Journal 70-75
Read: 727 Downloads: 358 Published: 10 October 2021

The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of a closed drainage system (a bedside procedure) to that of an ultra­sound-guided drainage system. 29 patients with pleural effu­sion were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound- guided small-bore pleural catheter placement (Pigtail® group, n=15) or catheter placement without ultrasound-guidance (Pleuracan® group, n=14). Data on indications for tube place­ment, drainage volume, mean duration of catheter stay, com­plications, and effectiveness of drainage were collected. Findings for the two groups were compared. The Pleuracan® group included 9 males and 5 females (mean age: 59.2±23.4 years), the Pigtail® group included 10 males and 5 females (mean age: 49.4±22.5 years). There were no statistically sig­nificant differences between the groups regarding sex distrib­ution, age or catheter calibers used. The most common diag­nosis was complicated parapneumonic effusion (34%). The other indications for tube placement were malignancy (21%), hemorrhagic effusion (21%), transudate (21%) and hemotho­rax (3%). The patients with Pleuracan® catheters showed The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of a closed drainage system (a bedside procedure) to that of an ultra­sound-guided drainage system. 29 patients with pleural effu­sion were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound- guided small-bore pleural catheter placement (Pigtail® group, n=15) or catheter placement without ultrasound-guidance (Pleuracan® group, n=14). Data on indications for tube place­ment, drainage volume, mean duration of catheter stay, com­plications, and effectiveness of drainage were collected. Findings for the two groups were compared. The Pleuracan® group included 9 males and 5 females (mean age: 59.2±23.4 years), the Pigtail® group included 10 males and 5 females (mean age: 49.4±22.5 years). There were no statistically sig­nificant differences between the groups regarding sex distrib­ution, age or catheter calibers used. The most common diag­nosis was complicated parapneumonic effusion (34%). The other indications for tube placement were malignancy (21%), hemorrhagic effusion (21%), transudate (21%) and hemotho­rax (3%). The patients with Pleuracan® catheters showed small-diameter tubes are as safe as ultrasound-guided sys­tems.

Files
EISSN 2979-9139