The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 25 ISSUE: 6
P: 215 - 220
November 2024

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Turk Thorac J 2024;25(6):215-220
1. Uşak University Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Uşak, Türkiye
2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Türkiye
3. Okan University Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul, Türkiye
4. Department of Rheumatology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli, Türkiye
5. Pamukkale University Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Denizli, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 26.12.2023
Accepted Date: 15.08.2024
Online Date: 15.08.2024
Publish Date: 15.08.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with SSc according to the 2013 EULAR/ACR criteria were included. After recording the demographic data of the patients, dyspnea was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), exercise capacity with the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD), fatigue level with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), disease activity with the Medsger Disease Severity Scale, skin involvement with the Modified Rodnan Skin Score, and dyspnea level with the mMRC Dyspnea Scale. The mMRC Dyspnea Scale was administered to the patients with SSc who did not receive any treatment for test-retest reliability at 1-week intervals.

RESULTS: The observed scale range in mMRC (TR) was 0-4, and twelve out of the thirty patients (40%) were classified as having “moderate dyspnea.” mMRC (TR) showed a significant moderate positive correlation with VAS dyspnea (rho: 0.718), a low negative correlation with 6MWD (rho: –0.445), and a low positive correlation with FSS (rho: 0.385). The weighted kappa statistic, used as an agreement scale for ordinal responses, was found to be 0.587 (indicating moderate agreement).

CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the mMRC Dyspnea Scale demonstrates validity and reliability in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease.

Keywords:
KEYWORDS: Dyspnea, fatigue, sclerosis, skin