The Effect of Home Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Quality of Life in Patients with Bronchiectasis and Related Factors
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Oral Presentation
VOLUME: 20 ISSUE: 1
P: 170 - 170
April 2019

The Effect of Home Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Quality of Life in Patients with Bronchiectasis and Related Factors

1. Clinic of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Accepted Date: 02.08.2019
Online Date: 02.08.2019
Publish Date: 02.08.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objectives:

We aimed to investigate the effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the quality of life and related factors in patients with bronchiectasis.
 

Methods:

The patients were included prospectively in the study and followed a home-based PR program for 2-months comprising breathing exercises, training in chest hygiene techniques, peripheral muscle strengthening training and self-walking. The outcomes measurements were six-minute walking distance (6MWD), pulmonary function test (FEV1%, FVC%) peripheral and respiratory muscle strength (MIP, MEP) measurements, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores and Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
 

Results:

A total of 19 patients, 37% of whom were men and mean age 48.36 years, were included in the study. A comparison of the outcome measures recorded before and after PR, although there was a decreased in the SGRQ symptom score and an increase in the activity, impact, and total score, but these changes did not reflect the statistical level. Similarly, there were positive improvements in 6MWD, MIP, MEP, mMRC and peripheral muscle strength which were not reflected in the statistical level. Correlation analysis between SGRQ subscales and the amount of change after PR in the patients clinical features was found to be moderately correlated with SGRQ symptom score and 6MWD(r=.580, p=.023).
 

Conclusion:

Pulmonary rehabilitation ensures positive improvements in the quality of life and general clinical status except lung functions of such patients. The lack of reflection of the obtained rehabilitation gains on the statistical level may be caused by progressive lung pathology.

Keywords:
Dyspnea, exercise, lung function, muscle strength, quality of life