The Necessity of Bronchiectasis Registries - The Turkish Registry of Bronchiectasis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Letter to the Editor
VOLUME: 27 ISSUE: 1
P: 75 - 76
January 2026

The Necessity of Bronchiectasis Registries - The Turkish Registry of Bronchiectasis

Turk Thorac J 2026;27(1):75-76
1. Department of Chest Diseases, Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Türkiye
2. Department of Chest Diseases, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en  Red (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
3. Clinic of Chest Diseases, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Karaman, Türkiye
4. Department of Chest Diseases, İzmir University of Economics Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
5. Department of Chest Diseases, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 28.05.2025
Accepted Date: 15.12.2025
Online Date: 30.01.2026
Publish Date: 30.01.2026
E-Pub Date: 20.01.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

DEAR EDITOR,

Bronchiectasis demonstrates a significant discrepancy between its high prevalence and the limited evidence base. Patient registries, both national and international, are key to collecting comprehensive data. However, the cost-effectiveness of this approach remains a subject of ongoing debate.1

In the opinion of the authors of this editorial, despite the significant costs and effort involved in establishing such registries, they are justified—provided that certain key characteristics are met. The registry must be sufficiently comprehensive in capturing relevant variables to avoid missing critical data that could impede meaningful research, particularly in areas such as therapeutic interventions, comorbidities, microbiological findings, and prognostic factors.

Given the geographic diversity of bronchiectasis, registries should reflect regional or national characteristics. Currently, 15 bronchiectasis registries are active worldwide. The largest registries are the European (EMBARC, ~20,000 patients), the Chinese (~16,000 patients), and the U.S. (~8,000 patients). Several countries, including Spain, India, Germany, Italy, Australia, South Korea, Japan, Türkiye, and the U.K. (closed in 2023), have data on over 1,000 patients. Others, such as Argentina, New Zealand, Canada, and Brazil, are still in the early stages.2 In Spain, an earlier registry (2002–2011) included 2,123 patients from 36 centers,3 while the ongoing RIBRON registry (since 2015) has data on 2,631 patients from 42 centers with over 7 years of follow-up.4

A significant advancement in this field in Türkiye has been the development of the “Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database” (TEBVEB), established with support from the Turkish Thoracic Society (Figure 1).5 TEBVEB is a web-based registry designed to collect detailed demographic, clinical, and microbiological data on Turkish patients with bronchiectasis. Between March 2019 and January 2022, 1,035 adult patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled at 25 centers.

This study is the first multicenter prospective investigation of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with bronchiectasis in Türkiye. The findings suggest that patients in Türkiye are diagnosed at a younger age compared to their European counterparts, and post-infectious bronchiectasis remains common. Additionally, comorbid COPD emerges as a major determinant of mortality. The lower-than-expected prevalence of tuberculosis indicates the effectiveness of infection control programs in the country.

The Turkish Bronchiectasis Database provides a robust foundation for national research on bronchiectasis in Türkiye and has contributed significantly to the development of national health policies.

National registries can inform health policy, particularly regarding infection prevention and the appropriate use of antibiotics and corticosteroids. Developing specialized protocols is also key to ensuring optimal patient management.

Keywords:
Bronchiectasis, bronchiectasis database, national registry

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere gratitude to the researchers who have contributed to the advancement of bronchiectasis research and the development of national and international bronchiectasis registries.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: D.K., M.A.M-G., A.Ş.C., O.K., E.Ç.E., Design: D.K., M.A.M-G., S.Ç., A.Ş.C., O.K., Literature Search: D.K., M.A.M-G., E.Ç.E., Writing: D.K., M.A.M-G., S.Ç.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide [Internet]. 4th ed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Sep. Chapter 1, Patient registries.
2
Oscullo G, Bekki A, de la Rosa D, Martinez-García MA. Registries for bronchiectasis in the world: an opportunity for international collaboration. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2025;29(5):199-201.
3
Martínez-García MÁ, Oscullo G, Gómez-Olivas JD, et al. Bronchiectasis: changes in the characterization of patients during 20 years of follow-up. Data from the Spanish Bronchiectasis Registries. Arch Bronconeumol. 2023;59(10):688-690. English, Spanish.
4
de la Rosa-Carrillo D, Máiz-Carro L, Martínez-García MÁ. What Have we learned about bronchiectasis from RIBRON (Spanish Bronchiectasis Registry)? Arch Bronconeumol. 2023 Oct;59(10):625-626. English, Spanish.
5
Çakır Edis E, Çilli A, Kızılırmak D, et al. Bronchiectasis in Türkiye: data from a multicenter registry (Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database). Balkan Med J. 2024;41(3):206-212.